Core Arguments for Withdrawal (Summarized)
Here’s why many believe Bill C-9 should be withdrawn — especially to protect religious freedom:
✅ 1. It Risks Criminalizing Faith-Based Speech
Without the religious-expression defence, quoting scripture or teaching doctrine honestly could be legally risky.
✅ 2. Creates Legal Uncertainty
Faith communities may curtail religious teachings out of fear of misinterpretation or legal complaint.
✅ 3. Threatens Charter Freedoms
Freedom of religion and expression are fundamental rights in Canada’s Charter — and critics believe Bill C-9 weakens protections, especially for minority or non-mainstream faiths.
✅ 4. Unnecessary & Overbroad
There’s no clear evidence that this change is needed — existing hate-speech laws already have high thresholds for prosecution.
✅ 5. Better Alternatives Exist
Many argue that hate, discrimination, and harassment are better tackled through education, community programs, and existing laws — not through expanding criminal offences.
🔎 Conclusion
While the intent behind Bill C-9 — combating hate and protecting vulnerable groups — is broadly supported, the current form of the bill, especially the removal of traditional religious protections, has raised serious objections from faith leaders, civil liberties groups, and legal experts.
Those who want it withdrawn argue that:
- Canada should uphold the Charter rights of all Canadians, including freedom of religion and expression.
- Protecting religious freedom means preserving legal safeguards that let people speak about their beliefs without fear of criminal prosecution.
- Laws should be precise, necessary, and not overly broad — especially when fundamental rights are at stake.
Please consider adding your name to the online petition to withdraw Bill C-9.